Ideas of Francesco Orsi, by Theme
[Italian, fl. 2015, PhD at Reading, then at University of Tartu, Estonia.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / a. Nature of supervenience
18680
|
To avoid misunderstandings supervenience is often expressed negatively: no A-change without B-change
|
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 3. Acting on Reason / c. Reasons as causes
18684
|
Rather than requiring an action, a reason may 'entice' us, or be 'eligible', or 'justify' it
|
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 1. Nature of Value / a. Nature of value
18685
|
Final value is favoured for its own sake, and personal value for someone's sake
|
18666
|
Value-maker concepts (such as courageous or elegant) simultaneously describe and evaluate
|
18667
|
The '-able' concepts (like enviable) say this thing deserves a particular response
|
18679
|
Things are only valuable if something makes it valuable, and we can ask for the reason
|
18682
|
A complex value is not just the sum of the values of the parts
|
18683
|
Trichotomy Thesis: comparable values must be better, worse or the same
|
18686
|
The Fitting Attitude view says values are fitting or reasonable, and values are just byproducts
|
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 1. Nature of Value / c. Objective value
18672
|
Values from reasons has the 'wrong kind of reason' problem - admiration arising from fear
|
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 1. Nature of Value / f. Ultimate value
18677
|
A thing may have final value, which is still derived from other values, or from relations
|
22. Metaethics / B. Value / 2. Values / a. Normativity
18668
|
Truths about value entail normative truths about actions or attitudes
|
18670
|
The Buck-Passing view of normative values says other properties are reasons for the value
|
18669
|
Values can be normative in the Fitting Attitude account, where 'good' means fitting favouring
|