Ideas of Michael Walzer, by Theme
[American, b.1935, At Harvard, and then the Institute of Advance Studies at Princeton.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 4. Responsibility for Actions
23590
|
Criminal responsibility can be fully assigned to each member of a group
|
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 5. Action Dilemmas / b. Double Effect
23578
|
Double Effect needs a double intention - to achieve the good, and minimise the evil
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / d. Ethical theory
23564
|
Deep ethical theory is very controversial, but we have to live with higher ethical practice
|
24. Political Theory / A. Basis of a State / 4. Original Position / b. Veil of ignorance
20595
|
You can't distribute goods from behind a veil, because their social meaning is unclear [Tuckness/Wolf]
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 2. Political equality
20592
|
Complex equality restricts equalities from spilling over, like money influencing politics and law [Tuckness/Wolf]
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 4. Economic equality
20549
|
Equality is complex, with different spheres of equality where different principles apply [Swift]
|
25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights
23568
|
If whole states possess rights, there can be social relations between states
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / a. Just wars
23587
|
Nuclear bombs are not for normal war; they undermine the 'just war', with a new morality
|
23567
|
Even non-violent intrusive acts between states count as aggression, if they justify resistance
|
23570
|
The only good reason for fighting is in defence of rights
|
23571
|
States can rightly pre-empt real and serious threats
|
23572
|
Just wars are self-defence, or a rightful intercession in another's troubles
|
23581
|
The aim of reprisals is to enforce the rules of war
|
23582
|
Reprisal is defensible, as an alternative to war
|
23588
|
With nuclear weapons we have a permanent supreme emergency (which is unstable)
|
23580
|
States need not endure attacks passively, and successful reprisals are legitimate
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / b. Justice in war
23593
|
Jus ad bellum and Jus in bello are independent; unjust wars can be fought in a just way
|
23577
|
Napoleon said 'I don't care about the deaths of a million men'
|
23573
|
For moral reasons, a just war must be a limited war
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / c. Combatants
23589
|
Kidnapped sailors and volunteers have different obligations to the passengers
|
23574
|
The duties and moral status of loyal and obedient soldiers is the same in defence and aggression
|
23575
|
We can't blame soldiers for anything they do which clearly promotes victory
|
23584
|
Rejecting Combatant Equality allows just soldiers to be harsher, even to the extreme
|
23614
|
Even aggressor soldiers are not criminals, so they have equal rights with their opponents
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / d. Non-combatants
23579
|
Soldiers will only protect civilians if they feel safe from them
|
23586
|
What matters in war is unacceptable targets, not unacceptable weapons
|
23591
|
If the oppressor is cruel, nonviolence is either surrender, or a mere gesture
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / e. Peace
23592
|
We can only lead war towards peace if we firmly enforce the rules of war
|