Ideas of Thomas Nagel, by Theme
[American, b.1937, Born in Yugoslavia. Studied with Rawls. Professor at New York University.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
1. Philosophy / A. Wisdom / 3. Wisdom Deflated
3240
|
There is more insight in fundamental perplexity about problems than in their supposed solutions
|
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 1. Philosophy
3269
|
If your life is to be meaningful as part of some large thing, the large thing must be meaningful
|
3242
|
Philosophy is the childhood of the intellect, and a culture can't skip it
|
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / b. Philosophy as transcendent
3241
|
It seems mad, but the aim of philosophy is to climb outside of our own minds
|
1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 3. Scientism
1489
|
Modern philosophy tends to be a theory-constructing extension of science, but there is also problem-solving
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 5. Objectivity
20989
|
Views are objective if they don't rely on a person's character, social position or species
|
22354
|
Things cause perceptions, properties have other effects, hence we reach a 'view from nowhere' [Reiss/Sprenger]
|
3248
|
Realism invites scepticism because it claims to be objective
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / c. Significance of supervenience
4242
|
Pure supervenience explains nothing, and is a sign of something fundamental we don't know
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 7. Emergent Properties
3291
|
Emergent properties appear at high levels of complexity, but aren't explainable by the lower levels
|
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 2. Qualities in Perception / b. Primary/secondary
22429
|
We achieve objectivity by dropping secondary qualities, to focus on structural primary qualities
|
3249
|
Modern science depends on the distinction between primary and secondary qualities
|
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 4. Sense Data / d. Sense-data problems
3296
|
Sense-data are a false objectification of what is essentially subjective
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 2. Pragmatic justification
3247
|
Epistemology is centrally about what we should believe, not the definition of knowledge
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 5. Controlling Beliefs
3271
|
We can't control our own beliefs
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 8. Social Justification
3270
|
Justifications come to an end when we want them to
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
3252
|
Scepticism is based on ideas which scepticism makes impossible
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / E. Relativism / 4. Cultural relativism
1490
|
You would have to be very morally lazy to ignore criticisms of your own culture
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 4. Reason in Induction
3251
|
Observed regularities are only predictable if we assume hidden necessity
|
15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 1. Mind / a. Mind
3295
|
Inner v outer brings astonishment that we are a particular person
|
15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 5. Unity of Mind
2957
|
Brain bisection suggests unity of mind isn't all-or-nothing [Lockwood]
|
15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 1. Consciousness / b. Essence of consciousness
3286
|
An organism is conscious if and only if there is something it is like to be that organism
|
16. Persons / B. Nature of the Self / 4. Presupposition of Self
3285
|
We may be unable to abandon personal identity, even when split-brains have undermined it
|
3293
|
If you assert that we have an ego, you can still ask if that future ego will be me
|
3244
|
Personal identity cannot be fully known a priori
|
3245
|
The question of whether a future experience will be mine presupposes personal identity
|
16. Persons / D. Continuity of the Self / 4. Split Consciousness
3246
|
I can't even conceive of my brain being split in two
|
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 1. Nature of Free Will
3292
|
The most difficult problem of free will is saying what the problem is
|
17. Mind and Body / A. Mind-Body Dualism / 7. Zombies
3288
|
Can we describe our experiences to zombies?
|
17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 6. Mysterianism
4883
|
Nagel's title creates an impenetrable mystery, by ignoring a bat's ways that may not be "like" anything [Dennett]
|
3287
|
We can't be objective about experience
|
17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / d. Explanatory gap
4989
|
Physicalism should explain how subjective experience is possible, but not 'what it is like' [Kirk,R]
|
19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 6. Meaning as Use
4001
|
The meaning of a word contains all its possible uses as well as its actual ones
|
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 5. Action Dilemmas / c. Omissions
6479
|
Noninterference requires justification as much as interference does
|
22. Metaethics / A. Value / 1. Nature of Value / c. Objective value
3257
|
Total objectivity can't see value, but it sees many people with values
|
22. Metaethics / A. Value / 2. Values / d. Death
3265
|
We don't worry about the time before we were born the way we worry about death
|
22. Metaethics / A. Value / 2. Values / e. Altruism
3263
|
If our own life lacks meaning, devotion to others won't give it meaning
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / f. Good as pleasure
3256
|
Pain doesn't have a further property of badness; it gives a reason for its avoidance
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / i. Moral luck
3272
|
Moral luck can arise in character, preconditions, actual circumstances, and outcome
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / a. Preconditions for ethics
6450
|
Morality must be motivating, and not because of pre-moral motives
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / d. Ethical theory
3284
|
There is no one theory of how to act (or what to believe)
|
23. Ethics / B. Contract Ethics / 6. Game Theory
6447
|
Game theory misses out the motivation arising from the impersonal standpoint
|
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 1. Deontology
3261
|
Something may be 'rational' either because it is required or because it is acceptable
|
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 2. Duty
3258
|
If cockroaches can't think about their actions, they have no duties
|
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 3. Universalisability
3282
|
The general form of moral reasoning is putting yourself in other people's shoes
|
3294
|
As far as possible we should become instruments to realise what is best from an eternal point of view
|
3254
|
If we can decide how to live after stepping outside of ourselves, we have the basis of a moral theory
|
3264
|
We should see others' viewpoints, but not lose touch with our own values
|
6446
|
In ethics we abstract from our identity, but not from our humanity
|
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 4. Categorical Imperative
6477
|
I can only universalise a maxim if everyone else could also universalise it
|
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 6. Motivation for Duty
3255
|
We find new motives by discovering reasons for action different from our preexisting motives
|
23. Ethics / E. Utilitarianism / 3. Motivation for Altruism
3262
|
Utilitarianism is too demanding
|
23. Ethics / F. Existentialism / 2. Nihilism
3268
|
If a small brief life is absurd, then so is a long and large one
|
24. Political Theory / A. Basis of a State / 4. Original Position / c. Difference principle
3278
|
An egalitarian system must give priority to those with the worst prospects in life
|
24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 6. Liberalism / c. Liberal equality
6448
|
A legitimate system is one accepted as both impartial and reasonably partial
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 1. Grounds of equality
3275
|
Equality was once opposed to aristocracy, but now it opposes public utility and individual rights
|
3277
|
In judging disputes, should we use one standard, or those of each individual?
|
3281
|
The ideal of acceptability to each individual underlies the appeal to equality
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 2. Political equality
3274
|
Equality can either be defended as good for society, or as good for individual rights
|
3273
|
Equality nowadays is seen as political, social, legal and economic
|
6478
|
Democracy is opposed to equality, if the poor are not a majority
|
25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights
3276
|
A morality of rights is very minimal, leaving a lot of human life without restrictions or duties
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / d. Causal necessity
3290
|
Given the nature of heat and of water, it is literally impossible for water not to boil at the right heat
|