Ideas of Peter Geach, by Theme
[British, 1916 - 2013, Married to Elizabeth Anscombe. University of Leeds.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. Using Numbers / d. Counting via concepts
12154
|
Are 'word token' and 'word type' different sorts of countable objects, or two ways of counting? [Perry]
|
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / c. Against mathematical empiricism
10735
|
Abstraction from objects won't reveal an operation's being performed 'so many times'
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 10. Properties as Predicates
8780
|
Attributes are functions, not objects; this distinguishes 'square of 2' from 'double of 2'
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 6. Nihilism about Objects
8969
|
We should abandon absolute identity, confining it to within some category [Hawthorne]
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 3. Relative Identity
16075
|
Denial of absolute identity has drastic implications for logic, semantics and set theory [Wasserman]
|
12152
|
Identity is relative. One must not say things are 'the same', but 'the same A as'
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 8. Leibniz's Law
16073
|
Leibniz's Law is incomplete, since it includes a non-relativized identity predicate [Wasserman]
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 9. Sameness
11910
|
Being 'the same' is meaningless, unless we specify 'the same X'
|
15. Nature of Minds / C. Capacities of Minds / 3. Abstraction by mind
8775
|
A big flea is a small animal, so 'big' and 'small' cannot be acquired by abstraction
|
8776
|
We cannot learn relations by abstraction, because their converse must be learned too
|
15. Nature of Minds / C. Capacities of Minds / 5. Generalisation by mind
10732
|
If concepts are just recognitional, then general judgements would be impossible
|
17. Mind and Body / B. Behaviourism / 2. Potential Behaviour
2567
|
You can't define real mental states in terms of behaviour that never happens
|
17. Mind and Body / B. Behaviourism / 4. Behaviourism Critique
2568
|
Beliefs aren't tied to particular behaviours
|
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 2. Origin of Concepts / a. Origin of concepts
8781
|
The mind does not lift concepts from experience; it creates them, and then applies them
|
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 3. Ontology of Concepts / b. Concepts as abilities
10731
|
For abstractionists, concepts are capacities to recognise recurrent features of the world
|
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 5. Concepts and Language / c. Concepts without language
8769
|
If someone has aphasia but can still play chess, they clearly have concepts
|
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 3. Abstracta by Ignoring
8770
|
'Abstractionism' is acquiring a concept by picking out one experience amongst a group
|
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 8. Abstractionism Critique
8771
|
'Or' and 'not' are not to be found in the sensible world, or even in the world of inner experience
|
8772
|
We can't acquire number-concepts by extracting the number from the things being counted
|
8773
|
Abstractionists can't explain counting, because it must precede experience of objects
|
8774
|
The numbers don't exist in nature, so they cannot have been abstracted from there into our languages
|
8778
|
Blind people can use colour words like 'red' perfectly intelligently
|
8777
|
If 'black' and 'cat' can be used in the absence of such objects, how can such usage be abstracted?
|
8779
|
We can form two different abstract concepts that apply to a single unified experience
|
10733
|
The abstractionist cannot explain 'some' and 'not'
|
10734
|
Only a judgement can distinguish 'striking' from 'being struck'
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / a. Form of the Good
22489
|
'Good' is an attributive adjective like 'large', not predicative like 'red' [Foot]
|