Ideas of Wesley Salmon, by Theme
[American, 1925 - 2001, Professor at the University of Pittsburgh.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 2. Understanding
13047
|
It is knowing 'why' that gives scientific understanding, not knowing 'that'
|
13065
|
Understanding is an extremely vague concept
|
14. Science / A. Basis of Science / 4. Prediction
13054
|
Correlations can provide predictions, but only causes can give explanations
|
14. Science / B. Scientific Theories / 3. Instrumentalism
13067
|
For the instrumentalists there are no scientific explanations
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 4. Reason in Induction
13055
|
Good induction needs 'total evidence' - the absence at the time of any undermining evidence
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 1. Explanation / b. Aims of explanation
13046
|
Scientific explanation is not reducing the unfamiliar to the familiar
|
13058
|
Why-questions can seek evidence as well as explanation
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / a. Types of explanation
14366
|
An explanation is a table of statistical information [Strevens]
|
13050
|
The 'inferential' conception is that all scientific explanations are arguments
|
13059
|
Ontic explanations can be facts, or reports of facts
|
13064
|
The three basic conceptions of scientific explanation are modal, epistemic, and ontic
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / e. Lawlike explanations
13049
|
We must distinguish true laws because they (unlike accidental generalizations) explain things
|
13051
|
Deductive-nomological explanations will predict, and their predictions will explain
|
13053
|
A law is not enough for explanation - we need information about what makes a difference
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / g. Causal explanations
13061
|
Flagpoles explain shadows, and not vice versa, because of temporal ordering
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / i. Explanations by mechanism
17492
|
Salmon's interaction mechanisms needn't be regular, or involving any systems [Glennan]
|
17093
|
Causation produces productive mechanisms; to understand the world, understand these mechanisms
|
13045
|
Explanation at the quantum level will probably be by entirely new mechanisms
|
13062
|
Does an item have a function the first time it occurs?
|
13063
|
Explanations reveal the mechanisms which produce the facts
|
16557
|
Salmon's mechanisms are processes and interactions, involving marks, or conserved quantities [Machamer/Darden/Craver]
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / l. Probabilistic explanations
13060
|
Can events whose probabilities are low be explained?
|
13056
|
Statistical explanation needs relevance, not high probability
|
13057
|
Think of probabilities in terms of propensities rather than frequencies
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 4. Naturalised causation
8412
|
A causal interaction is when two processes intersect, and correlated modifications persist afterwards
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 5. Direction of causation
8413
|
Cause must come first in propagations of causal interactions, but interactions are simultaneous
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 8. Particular Causation / b. Causal relata
8411
|
Instead of localised events, I take enduring and extended processes as basic to causation
|
4784
|
Salmon says processes rather than events should be basic in a theory of physical causation [Psillos]
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 8. Particular Causation / e. Probabilistic causation
8409
|
Probabilistic causal concepts are widely used in everyday life and in science
|