Ideas of Peter van Inwagen, by Theme
[American, fl. 1983, Professor at Syracuse University, then professor at University of Notre Dame.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
2. Reason / D. Definition / 12. Paraphrase
14227
|
We could refer to tables as 'xs that are arranged tablewise'
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 8. Critique of Set Theory
8972
|
What in the real world could ground the distinction between the sets {A,{A,B}} and {B,{A,B}}?
|
4. Formal Logic / G. Formal Mereology / 1. Mereology
10662
|
Mereology is 'nihilistic' (just atoms) or 'universal' (no restrictions on what is 'whole') [Varzi]
|
5. Theory of Logic / D. Assumptions for Logic / 2. Excluded Middle
17587
|
The 'Law' of Excluded Middle needs all propositions to be definitely true or definitely false
|
5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 4. Variables in Logic
17558
|
Variables are just like pronouns; syntactic explanations get muddled over dummy letters
|
5. Theory of Logic / L. Paradox / 6. Paradoxes in Language / b. The Heap paradox ('Sorites')
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 8. Stuff / a. Pure stuff
17578
|
I reject talk of 'stuff', and treat it in terms of particles
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 9. Vagueness / d. Vagueness as linguistic
17582
|
Singular terms can be vague, because they can contain predicates, which can be vague
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 1. Physical Objects
17556
|
Material objects are in space and time, move, have a surface and mass, and are made of some stuff
|
8264
|
Maybe table-shaped particles exist, but not tables [Lowe]
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 6. Nihilism about Objects
17565
|
Nihilism says composition between single things is impossible
|
14228
|
If there are no tables, but tables are things arranged tablewise, the denial of tables is a contradiction [Liggins]
|
14468
|
Actions by artefacts and natural bodies are disguised cooperations, so we don't need them
|
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 1. Unifying an Object / b. Unifying aggregates
17571
|
Every physical thing is either a living organism or a simple
|
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 3. Unity Problems / c. Statue and clay
17562
|
The statue and lump seem to share parts, but the statue is not part of the lump
|
17574
|
If you knead clay you make an infinite series of objects, but they are rearrangements, not creations
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 3. Matter of an Object
17531
|
I assume matter is particulate, made up of 'simples'
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 5. Composition of an Object
17560
|
If contact causes composition, do two colliding balls briefly make one object?
|
17561
|
If bricks compose a house, that is at least one thing, but it might be many things
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / a. Parts of objects
17566
|
I think parthood involves causation, and not just a reasonably stable spatial relationship
|
14230
|
We can deny whole objects but accept parts, by referring to them as plurals within things [Liggins]
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 8. Parts of Objects / c. Wholes from parts
17557
|
Special Composition Question: when is a thing part of something?
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 8. Essence as Explanatory
17564
|
The essence of a star includes the released binding energy which keeps it from collapse
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 11. Essence of Artefacts
17575
|
The persistence of artifacts always covertly involves intelligent beings
|
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 7. Intermittent Objects
17577
|
When an electron 'leaps' to another orbit, is the new one the same electron?
|
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 9. Ship of Theseus
17589
|
If you reject transitivity of vague identity, there is no Ship of Theseus problem
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 1. Concept of Identity
17588
|
We should talk of the transitivity of 'identity', and of 'definite identity'
|
10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 5. Modality from Actuality
17572
|
Actuality proves possibility, but that doesn't explain how it is possible
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / c. Counterparts
17579
|
Counterparts reduce counterfactual identity to problems about similarity relations
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / e. Possible Objects
17590
|
A merely possible object clearly isn't there, so that is a defective notion
|
17591
|
Merely possible objects must be consistent properties, or haecceities
|
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 7. Compatibilism
6981
|
Determinism clashes with free will, as the past determines action, and is beyond our control [Jackson]
|
23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 1. Virtue Theory / d. Virtue theory critique
7101
|
Virtue theory needs an external standard to judge behaviour and character [Statman]
|
27. Natural Reality / B. Modern Physics / 3. Chromodynamics / a. Chromodynamics
17563
|
The strong force pulls, but also pushes apart if nucleons get too close together
|
27. Natural Reality / F. Chemistry / 2. Modern Elements
17559
|
Is one atom a piece of gold, or is a sizable group of atoms required?
|
27. Natural Reality / G. Biology / 2. Life
17580
|
One's mental and other life is centred on the brain, unlike any other part of the body
|
17567
|
A flame is like a life, but not nearly so well individuated
|
17586
|
At the lower level, life trails off into mere molecular interaction
|
17581
|
Being part of an organism's life is a matter of degree, and vague
|
17570
|
The chemical reactions in a human life involve about sixteen elements
|
17569
|
Unlike waves, lives are 'jealous'; it is almost impossible for them to overlap
|
17584
|
Some events are only borderline cases of lives
|
17568
|
A tumour may spread a sort of life, but it is not a life, or an organism
|
17576
|
If God were to 'reassemble' my atoms of ten years ago, the result would certainly not be me
|
17585
|
Life is vague at both ends, but could it be totally vague?
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / b. Ontological Proof critique
17573
|
There is no reason to think that mere existence is a valuable thing
|