Ideas of G.E. Moore, by Theme
[British, 1873 - 1958, Born in London. Friend of Russell. Professor at Cambridge University. Wittgenstein was a pupil.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
1. Philosophy / C. History of Philosophy / 5. Modern Philosophy / b. Modern philosophy beginnings
6405
|
Moore's 'The Nature of Judgement' (1898) marked the rejection (with Russell) of idealism [Grayling]
|
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / c. Philosophy as generalisation
17992
|
The main aim of philosophy is to describe the whole Universe.
|
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 1. Nature of Analysis
7527
|
Analysis for Moore and Russell is carving up the world, not investigating language [Monk]
|
8. Modes of Existence / A. Relations / 2. Internal Relations
21342
|
A relation is internal if two things possessing the relation could not fail to be related [Heil]
|
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 4. Belief / c. Aim of beliefs
6672
|
Moore's Paradox: you can't assert 'I believe that p but p is false', but can assert 'You believe p but p is false' [Lowe]
|
11. Knowledge Aims / B. Certain Knowledge / 2. Common Sense Certainty
20147
|
Arguments that my finger does not exist are less certain than your seeing my finger
|
6349
|
I can prove a hand exists, by holding one up, pointing to it, and saying 'here is one hand'
|
19. Language / D. Propositions / 3. Concrete Propositions
22302
|
Moor bypassed problems of correspondence by saying true propositions ARE facts [Potter]
|
19. Language / D. Propositions / 5. Unity of Propositions
7526
|
Hegelians say propositions defy analysis, but Moore says they can be broken down [Monk]
|
21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 4. Beauty
21233
|
The beautiful is whatever it is intrinsically good to admire
|
22. Metaethics / A. Value / 1. Nature of Value / c. Objective value
18676
|
We should ask what we would judge to be good if it existed in absolute isolation
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / a. Form of the Good
11057
|
It is always an open question whether anything that is natural is good
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / b. Types of good
5925
|
The three main values are good, right and beauty [Ross]
|
22. Metaethics / B. The Good / 1. Goodness / c. Right and good
5903
|
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means
|
5902
|
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good [Ross]
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / b. Defining ethics
8039
|
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is [MacIntyre]
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / a. Idealistic ethics
11056
|
The naturalistic fallacy claims that natural qualties can define 'good'
|
22151
|
The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction [Boulter]
|
8032
|
Can learning to recognise a good friend help us to recognise a good watch? [MacIntyre]
|
8033
|
Moore cannot show why something being good gives us a reason for action [MacIntyre]
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / c. Ethical intuitionism
11050
|
Moore's combination of antinaturalism with strong supervenience on the natural is incoherent [Hanna]
|
23. Ethics / E. Utilitarianism / 1. Utilitarianism
5907
|
Relationships imply duties to people, not merely the obligation to benefit them [Ross]
|