green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of Ned Block, by Text
[American, b.1942, Professor at MIT until 1996, then at New York University.]
1978
|
Troubles with Functionalism
|
p. 69
|
p.69
|
2576
|
In functionalism, desires are internal states with causal relations
|
p. 69
|
p.69
|
2574
|
Behaviour requires knowledge as well as dispositions
|
p. 69
|
p.69
|
2575
|
Functionalism is behaviourism, but with mental states as intermediaries
|
p. 70
|
p.70
|
2578
|
Could a creature without a brain be in the right functional state for pain?
|
p. 70
|
p.70
|
2577
|
Simple machine-functionalism says mind just is a Turing machine
|
p. 71
|
p.71
|
2580
|
A Turing machine, given a state and input, specifies an output and the next state
|
p. 71
|
p.71
|
2579
|
Physicalism is prejudiced in favour of our neurology, when other systems might have minds
|
p. 78
|
p.78
|
2582
|
A brain looks no more likely than anything else to cause qualia
|
p. 78
|
p.78
|
2581
|
Intuition may say that a complex sentence is ungrammatical, but linguistics can show that it is not
|
p. 81
|
p.81
|
2583
|
You might invert colours, but you can't invert beliefs
|
p. 83
|
p.83
|
2584
|
Lobotomised patients can cease to care about a pain
|
p. 86
|
p.86
|
2585
|
Not just any old functional network will have mental states
|
p. 87
|
p.87
|
2586
|
In functionalism, what are the special inputs and outputs of conscious creatures?
|
|
p.153
|
3178
|
A fast machine could pass all behavioural tests with a vast lookup table [Rey]
|
|
p.132
|
6172
|
The Inverted Earth example shows that phenomenal properties are not representational [Rowlands]
|
1998
|
Semantics, Conceptual Role
|
|
p.955
|
18033
|
The meaning of a representation is its role in thought, perception or decisions
|