green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of J Pollock / J Cruz, by Text
[American, fl. 1999, Collaborators on a book on epistemology]
1999
|
Contemporary theories of Knowledge (2nd)
|
Pref
|
p.-4
|
6346
|
The main epistemological theories are foundationalist, coherence, probabilistic and reliabilist
|
§1.2
|
p.10
|
6351
|
Most people now agree that our reasoning proceeds defeasibly, rather than deductively
|
§1.4.6
|
p.19
|
6352
|
Enumerative induction gives a universal judgement, while statistical induction gives a proportion
|
§1.5.3
|
p.25
|
6354
|
Coherence theories fail, because they can't accommodate perception as the basis of knowledge
|
§1.5.3
|
p.25
|
6355
|
Direct realism says justification is partly a function of pure perceptual states, not of beliefs
|
§1.5.3
|
p.25
|
6353
|
People rarely have any basic beliefs, and never enough for good foundations
|
§2.1
|
p.29
|
6357
|
Reason cannot be an ultimate foundation, because rational justification requires prior beliefs
|
§2.3.1
|
p.36
|
6358
|
One belief may cause another, without being the basis for the second belief
|
§2.3.3.2
|
p.40
|
6359
|
Phenomenalism offered conclusive perceptual knowledge, but conclusive reasons no longer seem essential
|
§2.3.3.3
|
p.41
|
6360
|
Scientific confirmation is best viewed as inference to the best explanation
|
§2.5.3
|
p.59
|
6361
|
Foundationalism requires self-justification, not incorrigibility
|
§2.5.5
|
p.61
|
6362
|
Sense evidence is not beliefs, because they are about objective properties, not about appearances
|
§2.5.5
|
p.65
|
6363
|
Foundationalism is wrong, because either all beliefs are prima facie justified, or none are
|
§3.1
|
p.66
|
6364
|
We can't start our beliefs from scratch, because we wouldn't know where to start
|
§3.2.3
|
p.73
|
6365
|
Negative coherence theories do not require reasons, so have no regress problem
|
§3.2.3
|
p.74
|
6366
|
Perception causes beliefs in us, without inference or justification
|
§3.2.4
|
p.74
|
6367
|
Coherence theories isolate justification from the world
|
§4.1
|
p.91
|
6370
|
Externalism comes as 'probabilism' (probability of truth) and 'reliabilism' (probability of good cognitive process)
|
§4.3.1
|
p.101
|
6371
|
Bayesian epistemology is Bayes' Theorem plus the 'simple rule' (believe P if it is probable)
|
§4.3.1.5
|
p.105
|
6372
|
Since every tautology has a probability of 1, should we believe all tautologies?
|
§5.4.3
|
p.137
|
6373
|
Internalism says if anything external varies, the justifiability of the belief does not vary
|
§6.6
|
p.176
|
6374
|
To believe maximum truths, believe everything; to have infallible beliefs, believe nothing
|