green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of G.E. Moore, by Text
[British, 1873 - 1958, Born in London. Friend of Russell. Professor at Cambridge University. Wittgenstein was a pupil.]
1899
|
The Nature of Judgement
|
|
p.26
|
6405
|
Moore's 'The Nature of Judgement' (1898) marked the rejection (with Russell) of idealism [Grayling]
|
|
p.117
|
7527
|
Analysis for Moore and Russell is carving up the world, not investigating language [Monk]
|
|
p.117
|
7526
|
Hegelians say propositions defy analysis, but Moore says they can be broken down [Monk]
|
|
p.183
|
22302
|
Moor bypassed problems of correspondence by saying true propositions ARE facts [Potter]
|
|
p.2
|
11050
|
Moore's combination of antinaturalism with strong supervenience on the natural is incoherent [Hanna]
|
|
p.8
|
5902
|
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good [Ross]
|
|
p.15
|
8039
|
Moore tries to show that 'good' is indefinable, but doesn't understand what a definition is [MacIntyre]
|
|
p.19
|
5907
|
Relationships imply duties to people, not merely the obligation to benefit them [Ross]
|
|
p.108
|
22151
|
The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction [Boulter]
|
|
p.116
|
5925
|
The three main values are good, right and beauty [Ross]
|
|
p.252
|
8032
|
Can learning to recognise a good friend help us to recognise a good watch? [MacIntyre]
|
|
p.252
|
8033
|
Moore cannot show why something being good gives us a reason for action [MacIntyre]
|
§027
|
p.44
|
11057
|
It is always an open question whether anything that is natural is good
|
§044
|
p.73
|
11056
|
The naturalistic fallacy claims that natural qualties can define 'good'
|
§089
|
p.147
|
5903
|
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means
|
§112
|
p.187
|
18676
|
We should ask what we would judge to be good if it existed in absolute isolation
|
p.210
|
p.74
|
21233
|
The beautiful is whatever it is intrinsically good to admire
|
|
p.292
|
6672
|
Moore's Paradox: you can't assert 'I believe that p but p is false', but can assert 'You believe p but p is false' [Lowe]
|
1911
|
Some Main Problems of Philosophy
|
Ch. 1
|
p.1
|
17992
|
The main aim of philosophy is to describe the whole Universe.
|
1919
|
External and Internal Relations
|
|
p.313
|
21342
|
A relation is internal if two things possessing the relation could not fail to be related [Heil]
|
1922
|
Some Judgements of Perception
|
p.228
|
p.18
|
20147
|
Arguments that my finger does not exist are less certain than your seeing my finger
|
1939
|
Proof of an External World
|
p.1
|
p.24
|
6349
|
I can prove a hand exists, by holding one up, pointing to it, and saying 'here is one hand'
|