| 1277 | The Condemnation of 1277 |
| p.85 | 22142 | In future, only logical limits can be placed on divine omnipotence | |
| Full Idea: The Condemnation stipulated that all portions of the ancient intellectual heritage that placed non-logical limits on divine omnipotence were no longer to be tolerated. ...Philosophers now had to entertain the wildest ideas with all seriousness. | |||
| From: report of Anon (Par) (The Condemnation of 1277 [1277]) by Stephen Boulter - Why Medieval Philosophy Matters 3 | |||
| A reaction: Boulter identifies this as 'the ultimate source of Hume's philosophical delirium'. Presumably the angels-on-a-pinhead stuff originated with this. It is crazy to think that the only limit on possible existence is logic. Can God make a planet of uranium? |
| §17 | p.586 | 1865 | It is heresy to teach that natural impossibilities cannot even be achieved by God |
| Full Idea: It is heresy to teach that what is absolutely impossible according to nature cannot be brought about by God or another agent. | |||
| From: Anon (Par) (The Condemnation of 1277 [1277], §17) |
| §9 | p.585 | 1864 | It is heresy to teach that we can know God by his essence in this mortal life |
| Full Idea: It is heresy to teach that we can know God by his essence in this mortal life. | |||
| From: Anon (Par) (The Condemnation of 1277 [1277], §9) |
| §92 | p.588 | 1866 | It is heresy to teach that history repeats every 36,000 years |
| Full Idea: It is heresy to teach that with all the heavenly bodies coming back to the same point after a period of thirty-six thousand years, the same effects as now exist will reappear. | |||
| From: Anon (Par) (The Condemnation of 1277 [1277], §92) |
| 151 | p.444 | 16716 | It is heresy to require self-evident foundational principles in order to be certain |
| Full Idea: Heresy 151: 'To have certainty regarding any conclusion, it must be founded on self-evident principles'. | |||
| From: Anon (Par) (The Condemnation of 1277 [1277], 151), quoted by Robert Pasnau - Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 20.3 | |||
| A reaction: The correct view is obviously to found certainty on faith and authority. It is one thing to be told that foundationalism is a poor theory, but another to be told it is a heresy, and thus a potential capital crime! |