structure for 'Political Theory'    |     alphabetical list of themes    |     unexpand these ideas

24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 7. Communitarianism / b. Against communitarianism

[reasons against over-emphasis of community]

13 ideas
Kierkegaard prioritises the inward individual, rather than community [Kierkegaard, by Carlisle]
     Full Idea: Whereas Hegel argues that individuals find fulfilment through participation in their community, Kierkegaard prioritises the inwardness of each person, which is shared only with God.
     From: report of Søren Kierkegaard (Either/Or: a fragment of life [1843]) by Clare Carlisle - Kierkegaard: a guide for the perplexed 3
     A reaction: Sounds like the protestant religion opposing the catholic religion (although Hegel was a protestant). Individual v community is the great debate of the last two centuries in Europe.
Our reliance on other people close to us does not imply any political obligations [Taylor,C]
     Full Idea: We must all be nurtures by others as children, and we only flourish as adults in relationship with friends, mates, children and so on. But this has nothing to do with any obligation to belong to political society.
     From: Charles Taylor (Atomism [1979], p.42)
     A reaction: He is defending community, but not at that minimal human level. Political obligations follows from our need for a wider society, to achieve justice, education, travel, health etc. There are no rights without a society
In a pluralist society we can't expect a community united around one conception of the good [Rawls]
     Full Idea: The fact of pluralism means that the hope of political community must be abandoned, if by such a community we mean a political society united in affirming a general and comprehensive conception of the good.
     From: John Rawls (The Idea of Overlapping Consensus [1987]), quoted by Will Kymlicka - Community 'legitimacy'
     A reaction: A moderate pluralism might be manageable, but strong, diverse and dogmatic beliefs among sub-groups probably make it impossible.
Feminism has shown that social roles are far from fixed (as communitarians tend to see them) [Kymlicka]
     Full Idea: Communitarians say that some of our social roles must be regarded as fixed when planning our lives, …but the women's movement has shown how deeply entrenched social roles can be questioned and rejected.
     From: Will Kymlicka (Community [1993], 'Embedded')
     A reaction: True, but parents walking out on young children also shows that. The ideal must be some sort of balance.
Communitarianism struggles with excluded marginalised groups [Kymlicka]
     Full Idea: The problem of the exclusion of historically marginalised groups is endemic to the communitarian project.
     From: Will Kymlicka (Community [1993], 'legitimacy')
     A reaction: Put simply, old-fashioned styles of community are probably impossible in large modern states, some with rather arbitrary borders.
Participation aids the quest for the good life, but why should that be a state activity? [Kymlicka]
     Full Idea: Communitarians rarely distinguish between collective activities and political activities. Shared participation aids intelligent decisions about the good life, but why should that be organised through the state, rather than by free individuals?
     From: Will Kymlicka (Community [1993], 'need')
     A reaction: Kylicka points out later that local groups can be very unintelligent or prejudiced. Modern media have changed that picture, because participation can be with geographically remote people.
Communitarian states only encourage fairly orthodox ideas of the good life [Kymlicka]
     Full Idea: A communitarian state can and should encourage people to adopt conceptions of the good that conform to the community's way of life, while discouraging conceptions of the good that conflict with it.
     From: Will Kymlicka (Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn) [1990], 6.2)
     A reaction: This is the conservative aspect of communitarianism which many people (notably liberals) find uncongenial. This conservatism is implicit in Aristotle's account of virtue. I have become more conservative to accommodate it.
If our values are given to us by society then we have no grounds to criticise them [Avineri/De-Shalit]
     Full Idea: If communitarians are right that we are not free to choose, but rather that our values are determined by our community, the individualists say, then there is no reason to criticise the values of one's society.
     From: Avineri,S/De-Shalit,A (Intro to 'Communitarianism and Individualism' [1992], §5)
     A reaction: This is an obvious challenge, but if one's concept of community is a forum for free debate then it can be overcome. There is no avoiding the fact, though, that a good community always needs a high degree of consensus.
I can't defend the view that the majority values of a community are thereby right [Sandel]
     Full Idea: Insofar as 'communitarian' is another name for majoritarianism, or for the idea that rights should rest on the values that predominate in any given community at any given time, it is not a view I would defend.
     From: Michael J. Sandel (The Limits of Communitarianism [1998], 'Where')
     A reaction: I should hope not. You could soon end up as a good nazi if you follow that route. Sandel defends a critical view of community values (implying a role for philosophy?). The community good must be continually negotiated. Sounds fine to me.
Membership and inclusion in a community implies non-membership and exclusion [Swift]
     Full Idea: Community is about membership and inclusion. But that means it is also about non-membership and exclusion.
     From: Adam Swift (Political Philosophy (3rd ed) [2014], 4 'Conc')
     A reaction: I'm a fan of communitarianism (focused on Aristotle's life of individual virtue for each citizen), but I'm beginning to see that it has a poisonous cousin travelling under the same name. The cousin's rallying cries focus on aliens and enemies.
Liberals are concerned to protect individuals from too much community [Swift]
     Full Idea: Liberals are concerned to protect individuals from too much community - from practices that stifle the individual's freedom to choose for herself how she lives her life.
     From: Adam Swift (Political Philosophy (3rd ed) [2014], 4 'Liberalism')
     A reaction: The phrase 'too much community' is an excellent warning to communitarians. I'm happy to be enmeshed in a community, as long as it is composed of highly liberal and easy-going individuals. Avoid too much bad community.
For communitarians it seems that you must accept the culture you are born into [Charvet]
     Full Idea: Communitarians have difficulty avoiding the relativist trap. It seems they must claim that if one is born into a liberal society one cannot but be a liberal, and if one is born into a communist society one cannot but be a communist.
     From: John Charvet (Liberalism: the basics [2019], 08)
     A reaction: Anyone who accepts the Hegelian view of history and culture seems doomed to such relativism, and Hegel is a communitarian precursor. This is a good reason for me to reject communitarianism, after a long flirtation. We can criticise our own culture.
Community is now a nostalgic memory, which no longer exists [Berardi]
     Full Idea: Community is only a nostalgic memory of a past condition of belonging that exists no longer. Regret, not a living experience.
     From: Franco 'Bifo' Berardi (The Second Coming [2019], I 'Fascism')
     A reaction: It is hard to disagree with this. Local heroes in my town make lovely efforts to improve the place (with flowers, sculptures) but most of us don't know who they are. Capitalist competition erodes community.