14 ideas
15527 | Defining terms either enables elimination, or shows that they don't require elimination [Lewis] |
9161 | Maybe reasonableness requires circular justifications - that is one coherentist view [Field,H] |
15530 | A logically determinate name names the same thing in every possible world [Lewis] |
9160 | Lots of propositions are default reasonable, but the a priori ones are empirically indefeasible [Field,H] |
9164 | We treat basic rules as if they were indefeasible and a priori, with no interest in counter-evidence [Field,H] |
9165 | Reliability only makes a rule reasonable if we place a value on the truth produced by reliable processes [Field,H] |
9162 | Believing nothing, or only logical truths, is very reliable, but we want a lot more than that [Field,H] |
9166 | People vary in their epistemological standards, and none of them is 'correct' [Field,H] |
15528 | A Ramsey sentence just asserts that a theory can be realised, without saying by what [Lewis] |
15526 | There is a method for defining new scientific terms just using the terms we already understand [Lewis] |
15529 | It is better to have one realisation of a theory than many - but it may not always be possible [Lewis] |
15531 | The Ramsey sentence of a theory says that it has at least one realisation [Lewis] |
9163 | If we only use induction to assess induction, it is empirically indefeasible, and hence a priori [Field,H] |
468 | Musical performance can reveal a range of virtues [Damon of Ath.] |