Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Parmenides', 'Critique of Pure Reason' and 'The Folly of Trying to Define Truth'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
28. God / B. Proving God / 1. Proof of God
|
5607
|
Only three proofs of God: the physico-theological (evidence), the cosmological (existence), the ontological (a priori) [Kant]
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / a. Ontological Proof
|
234
|
We couldn't discuss the non-existence of the One without knowledge of it [Plato]
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / b. Ontological Proof critique
|
5609
|
If 'this exists' is analytic, either the thing is a thought, or you have presupposed its existence [Kant]
|
|
5610
|
If an existential proposition is synthetic, you must be able to cancel its predicate without contradiction [Kant]
|
|
5611
|
Being is not a real predicate, that adds something to a concept [Kant]
|
|
5612
|
You add nothing to the concept of God or coins if you say they exist [Kant]
|
|
8451
|
Existence is merely derived from the word 'is' (rather than being a predicate) [Kant, by Orenstein]
|
|
3321
|
Modern logic says (with Kant) that existence is not a predicate, because it has been reclassified as a quantifier [Benardete,JA on Kant]
|
|
13732
|
Kant never denied that 'exist' could be a predicate - only that it didn't enlarge concepts [Kant, by Fitting/Mendelsohn]
|
|
5608
|
Is "This thing exists" analytic or synthetic? [Kant]
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / a. Cosmological Proof
|
5598
|
If you prove God cosmologically, by a regress in the sequences of causes, you can't abandon causes at the end [Kant]
|