Combining Texts
Ideas for
'fragments/reports', 'Introduction to 'Evidentialism'' and 'The Case against Closure (and reply)'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / c. Knowledge closure
19544
|
Closure says if you know P, and also know P implies Q, then you must know Q [Dretske]
|
19545
|
We needn't regret the implications of our regrets; regretting drinking too much implies the past is real [Dretske]
|
19546
|
Knowing by visual perception is not the same as knowing by implication [Dretske]
|
19547
|
Reasons for believing P may not transmit to its implication, Q [Dretske]
|
19548
|
The only way to preserve our homely truths is to abandon closure [Dretske]
|
19549
|
P may imply Q, but evidence for P doesn't imply evidence for Q, so closure fails [Dretske]
|
19550
|
We know past events by memory, but we don't know the past is real (an implication) by memory [Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism
19518
|
Evidentialism says justifications supervene on the available evidence [Conee/Feldman]
|