Ideas from 'Foundations of Geometry' by Bertrand Russell [1897], by Theme Structure
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
unexpand these ideas
5. Theory of Logic / C. Ontology of Logic / 3. If-Thenism
10053
|
Geometrical axioms imply the propositions, but the former may not be true
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
We must only assert of various geometries that the axioms imply the propositions, not that the axioms are true and therefore that the propositions are true.
|
|
|
|
From:
Bertrand Russell (Foundations of Geometry [1897], Intro vii), quoted by Alan Musgrave - Logicism Revisited §4
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
Clearly the truth of the axioms can remain a separate issue from whether they actually imply the theorems. The truth of the axioms might be as much a metaphysical as an empirical question. Musgrave sees this as the birth of if-thenism.
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 3. Axioms for Geometry
10052
|
Geometry is united by the intuitive axioms of projective geometry
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Russell sought what was common to Euclidean and non-Euclidean systems, found it in the axioms of projective geometry, and took a Kantian view of them.
|
|
|
|
From:
report of Bertrand Russell (Foundations of Geometry [1897]) by Alan Musgrave - Logicism Revisited §4
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
Russell's work just preceded Hilbert's famous book. Tarski later produced some logical axioms for geometry.
|