green numbers give full details | back to texts | unexpand these ideas
| 12220 | Is it the sentence-token or the sentence-type that has a logical form? |
| Full Idea: Do we attribute a logical form to a sentence token because it is a token of a type with that form, or do we attribute a logical form to a sentence type because it is a type of a token with that form? | |||
| From: Kit Fine (Quine on Quantifying In [1990], p.110) | |||
| A reaction: Since I believe in propositions (as the unambiguous thought that lies behind a sentence), I take it that logical form concerns propositions, though strict logicians don't like this, for fear that logic spills into psychology. |
| 12222 | Substitutional quantification is referential quantification over expressions |
| Full Idea: Substitutional quantification may be regarded as referential quantification over expressions. | |||
| From: Kit Fine (Quine on Quantifying In [1990], p.124) | |||
| A reaction: This is an illuminating gloss. Does such quantification involve some ontological commitment to expressions? I feel an infinite regress looming. |