Ideas from 'Enquiry Conc Human Understanding' by David Hume [1748], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Enquiries Conc. Human Understanding, Morals' by Hume,David (ed/tr Selby-Bigge/Nidditch) [OUP 1975,0-19-824536-x]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
expand these ideas
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 7. Despair over Philosophy
2196
|
The observation of human blindness and weakness is the result of all philosophy
|
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 4. Conceptual Analysis
2187
|
If we suspect that a philosophical term is meaningless, we should ask what impression it derives from
|
1. Philosophy / G. Scientific Philosophy / 1. Aims of Science
2200
|
All experimental conclusions assume that the future will be like the past
|
2. Reason / E. Argument / 3. Analogy
4636
|
All reasoning concerning matters of fact is based on analogy (with similar results of similar causes)
|
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / a. Mathematical empiricism
2197
|
Reason assists experience in discovering laws, and in measuring their application
|
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 4. Abstract Existence
7700
|
We can't think about the abstract idea of triangles, but only of particular triangles
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 7. Against Powers
13602
|
We cannot form an idea of a 'power', and the word is without meaning
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 6. Probability
2216
|
We transfer the frequency of past observations to our future predictions
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 7. Chance
2215
|
There is no such thing as chance
|
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 4. Belief / a. Beliefs
2209
|
Belief is stronger, clearer and steadier than imagination
|
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 4. Belief / b. Elements of beliefs
2207
|
Belief can't be a concept plus an idea, or we could add the idea to fictions
|
2208
|
Belief is just a particular feeling attached to ideas of objects
|
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 4. Belief / d. Cause of beliefs
2213
|
Beliefs are built up by resemblance, contiguity and causation
|
3661
|
'Natural beliefs' are unavoidable, whatever our judgements [Strawson,G]
|
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 9. A Priori from Concepts
2191
|
Relations of ideas are known by thought, independently from the world
|
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 2. Qualities in Perception / e. Primary/secondary critique
2239
|
If secondary qualities (e.g. hardness) are in the mind, so are primary qualities like extension
|
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 3. Representation
2237
|
It never occurs to people that they only experience representations, not the real objects
|
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 1. Empiricism
2192
|
All reasoning about facts is causal; nothing else goes beyond memory and senses
|
2190
|
All objects of enquiry are Relations of Ideas, or Matters of Fact
|
2182
|
Impressions are our livelier perceptions, Ideas the less lively ones
|
2246
|
If books don't relate ideas or explain facts, commit them to the flames
|
2184
|
All ideas are copies of impressions
|
23631
|
Hume is loose when he says perceptions of different strength are different species [Reid]
|
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 2. Associationism
2189
|
All ideas are connected by Resemblance, Contiguity in time or place, and Cause and Effect
|
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 4. Pro-Empiricism
2186
|
We cannot form the idea of something we haven't experienced
|
2183
|
We can only invent a golden mountain by combining experiences
|
2702
|
Only madmen dispute the authority of experience
|
2194
|
How could Adam predict he would drown in water or burn in fire?
|
2205
|
You couldn't reason at all if you lacked experience
|
2217
|
When definitions are pushed to the limit, only experience can make them precise
|
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 5. Empiricism Critique
3902
|
Hume mistakenly lumps sensations and perceptions together as 'impressions' [Scruton]
|
23421
|
If a person had a gap in their experience of blue shades, they could imaginatively fill it in
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / c. Empirical foundations
2206
|
Reasons for belief must eventually terminate in experience, or they are without foundation
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
2235
|
There is no certain supreme principle, or infallible rule of inference
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 7. Testimony
10328
|
We think testimony matches reality because of experience, not some a priori connection
|
2230
|
Good testimony needs education, integrity, motive and agreement [PG]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism
2238
|
Reason can never show that experiences are connected to external objects
|
2242
|
Mitigated scepticism draws attention to the limitations of human reason, and encourages modesty
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 2. Types of Scepticism
2243
|
Mitigated scepticism sensibly confines our enquiries to the narrow capacity of human understanding
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 3. Illusion Scepticism
2236
|
Examples of illusion only show that sense experience needs correction by reason
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
2240
|
It is a very extravagant aim of the sceptics to destroy reason and argument by means of reason and argument
|
2241
|
The main objection to scepticism is that no good can come of it
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 2. Aims of Induction
2198
|
We assume similar secret powers behind similar experiences, such as the nourishment of bread
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 3. Limits of Induction
2199
|
Reason cannot show why reliable past experience should extend to future times and remote places
|
2204
|
All inferences from experience are effects of custom, not reasoning
|
2202
|
Fools, children and animals all learn from experience
|
2201
|
Induction can't prove that the future will be like the past, since induction assumes this
|
2203
|
If we infer causes from repetition, this explains why we infer from a thousand objects what we couldn't infer from one
|
14. Science / C. Induction / 4. Reason in Induction
6350
|
Premises can support an argument without entailing it [Pollock/Cruz]
|
3598
|
Hume just shows induction isn't deduction [Williams,M]
|
15. Nature of Minds / C. Capacities of Minds / 7. Seeing Resemblance
2210
|
A picture of a friend strengthens our idea of him, by resemblance
|
17712
|
General ideas are the connection by resemblance to some particular
|
8544
|
Hume does not distinguish real resemblances among degrees of resemblance [Shoemaker]
|
15. Nature of Minds / C. Capacities of Minds / 8. Remembering Contiguity
2211
|
When I am close to (contiguous with) home, I feel its presence more nearly
|
15. Nature of Minds / C. Capacities of Minds / 9. Perceiving Causation
2212
|
An object made by a saint is the best way to produce thoughts of him
|
2214
|
Our awareness of patterns of causation is too important to be left to slow and uncertain reasoning
|
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 5. Against Free Will
2222
|
The doctrine of free will arises from a false sensation we have of freedom in many actions
|
16. Persons / F. Free Will / 7. Compatibilism
3655
|
Hume makes determinism less rigid by removing the necessity from causation [Trusted]
|
2223
|
Liberty is merely acting according to the will, which anyone can do if they are not in chains
|
20. Action / B. Preliminaries of Action / 2. Willed Action / a. Will to Act
2220
|
Only experience teaches us about our wills
|
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 4. Responsibility for Actions
2224
|
Praise and blame can only be given if an action proceeds from a person's character and disposition
|
22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 1. Nature of Ethics / g. Moral responsibility
2225
|
If you deny all necessity and causation, then our character is not responsible for our crime
|
2226
|
Repentance gets rid of guilt, which shows that responsibility arose from the criminal principles in the mind
|
25. Social Practice / A. Freedoms / 3. Free speech
2233
|
No government has ever suffered by being too tolerant of philosophy
|
26. Natural Theory / A. Speculations on Nature / 2. Natural Purpose / b. Limited purposes
2195
|
We can discover some laws of nature, but never its ultimate principles and causes
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 1. Causation
4772
|
If a singular effect is studied, its cause can only be inferred from the types of events involved
|
2245
|
A priori it looks as if a cause could have absolutely any effect
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 7. Eliminating causation
8341
|
Hume never even suggests that there is no such thing as causation [Strawson,G]
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 8. Particular Causation / b. Causal relata
8344
|
At first Hume said qualities are the causal entities, but later he said events [Davidson]
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / a. Constant conjunction
2193
|
No causes can be known a priori, but only from experience of constant conjunctions
|
3662
|
Hume says we can only know constant conjunctions, not that that's what causation IS [Strawson,G]
|
4771
|
In both of Hume's definitions, causation is extrinsic to the sequence of events [Psillos]
|
5194
|
Hume's definition of cause as constantly joined thoughts can't cover undiscovered laws [Ayer]
|
2221
|
A cause is either similar events following one another, or an experience always suggesting a second experience
|
2234
|
It is only when two species of thing are constantly conjoined that we can infer one from the other
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / c. Counterfactual causation
8422
|
Cause is where if the first object had not been, the second had not existed
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / d. Causal necessity
15249
|
Hume never shows how a strong habit could generate the concept of necessity [Harré/Madden]
|
8339
|
Hume's regularity theory of causation is epistemological; he believed in some sort of natural necessity [Strawson,G]
|
2218
|
In observing causes we can never observe any necessary connections or binding qualities
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / b. Ontological Proof critique
2244
|
It can never be a logical contradiction to assert the non-existence of something thought to exist
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / c. Teleological Proof critique
2232
|
You can't infer the cause to be any greater than its effect
|
28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / e. Miracles
2227
|
A miracle violates laws which have been established by continuous unchanging experience, so should be ignored
|
2229
|
To establish a miracle the falseness of the evidence must be a greater miracle than the claimed miraculous event
|
2228
|
All experience must be against a supposed miracle, or it wouldn't be called 'a miracle'
|
28. God / C. Attitudes to God / 4. God Reflects Humanity
2185
|
The idea of an infinite, intelligent, wise and good God arises from augmenting the best qualities of our own minds
|