Ideas from 'The Possibility of Metaphysics' by E.J. Lowe [1998], by Theme Structure
[found in 'The Possibility of Metaphysics' by Lowe,E.J. [OUP 2001,0-19-924499-5]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
expand these ideas
1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 1. Nature of Metaphysics
9414
|
Metaphysics is the mapping of possibilities [Mumford]
|
16414
|
Science needs metaphysics to weed out its presuppositions [Hofweber]
|
1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 5. Metaphysics beyond Science
8282
|
Only metaphysics can decide whether identity survives through change
|
16127
|
Metaphysics tells us what there could be, rather than what there is
|
2. Reason / D. Definition / 12. Paraphrase
8262
|
How can a theory of meaning show the ontological commitments of two paraphrases of one idea?
|
3. Truth / C. Correspondence Truth / 2. Correspondence to Facts
8315
|
Maybe facts are just true propositions
|
3. Truth / C. Correspondence Truth / 3. Correspondence Truth critique
8319
|
One-to-one correspondence would need countable, individuable items
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 1. Set Theory
8309
|
A set is a 'number of things', not a 'collection', because nothing actually collects the members
|
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / b. Empty (Null) Set
8322
|
I don't believe in the empty set, because (lacking members) it lacks identity-conditions
|
5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 3. Objectual Quantification
8312
|
It is better if the existential quantifier refers to 'something', rather than a 'thing' which needs individuation
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / c. Fregean numbers
8297
|
Numbers are universals, being sets whose instances are sets of appropriate cardinality
|
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / d. Hume's Principle
8266
|
Simple counting is more basic than spotting that one-to-one correlation makes sets equinumerous
|
8302
|
Fs and Gs are identical in number if they one-to-one correlate with one another
|
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / a. For mathematical platonism
8298
|
Sets are instances of numbers (rather than 'collections'); numbers explain sets, not vice versa
|
8311
|
If 2 is a particular, then adding particulars to themselves does nothing, and 2+2=2
|
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / b. Against mathematical platonism
8310
|
Does the existence of numbers matter, in the way space, time and persons do?
|
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 1. Nature of Existence
8321
|
All possible worlds contain abstracta (e.g. numbers), which means they contain concrete objects
|
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 6. Criterion for Existence
8300
|
Perhaps possession of causal power is the hallmark of existence (and a reason to deny the void)
|
7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 1. Nature of Change
8281
|
Heraclitus says change is new creation, and Spinoza that it is just phases of the one substance
|
7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 4. Events / a. Nature of events
8270
|
Events are changes or non-changes in properties and relations of persisting objects
|
7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 4. Events / b. Events as primitive
8308
|
Events are ontologically indispensable for singular causal explanations
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 8. Facts / a. Facts
8314
|
Are facts wholly abstract, or can they contain some concrete constituents?
|
8316
|
Facts cannot be wholly abstract if they enter into causal relations
|
8318
|
The problem with the structured complex view of facts is what binds the constituents
|
8323
|
It is whimsical to try to count facts - how many facts did I learn before breakfast?
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 8. Facts / e. Facts rejected
8313
|
Facts are needed for truth-making and causation, but they seem to lack identity criteria
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 11. Ontological Commitment / a. Ontological commitment
8258
|
Two of the main rivals for the foundations of ontology are substances, and facts or states-of-affairs
|
8301
|
Some abstractions exist despite lacking causal powers, because explanation needs them
|
7. Existence / E. Categories / 1. Categories
8283
|
Ontological categories are not natural kinds: the latter can only be distinguished using the former
|
7. Existence / E. Categories / 3. Proposed Categories
8284
|
The top division of categories is either abstract/concrete, or universal/particular, or necessary/contingent
|
13122
|
Lowe divides things into universals and particulars, then kinds and properties, and abstract/concrete [Westerhoff]
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 10. Properties as Predicates
8273
|
Is 'the Thames is broad in London' relational, or adverbial, or segmental?
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 13. Tropes / a. Nature of tropes
8285
|
I prefer 'modes' to 'tropes', because it emphasises their dependence
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 13. Tropes / b. Critique of tropes
8286
|
Tropes cannot have clear identity-conditions, so they are not objects
|
8295
|
Why cannot a trope float off and join another bundle?
|
8294
|
How can tropes depend on objects for their identity, if objects are just bundles of tropes?
|
8296
|
Does a ball snug in plaster have one trope, or two which coincide?
|
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 1. Universals
8288
|
Sortal terms for universals involve a substance, whereas adjectival terms do not
|
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 2. Need for Universals
8293
|
Real universals are needed to explain laws of nature
|
8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 4. Uninstantiated Universals
8307
|
Particulars are instantiations, and universals are instantiables
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 1. Physical Objects
8267
|
Perhaps concrete objects are entities which are in space-time and subject to causality
|
8265
|
Our commitment to the existence of objects should depend on their explanatory value
|
8275
|
Objects are entities with full identity-conditions, but there are entities other than objects
|
16130
|
To be an object at all requires identity-conditions
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 3. Objects in Thought
8263
|
An object is an entity which has identity-conditions
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / a. Individuation
8268
|
Some things (such as electrons) can be countable, while lacking proper identity
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / b. Individuation by properties
8303
|
Criteria of identity cannot individuate objects, because they are shared among different types
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / c. Individuation by location
8292
|
Diversity of two tigers is their difference in space-time; difference of matter is a consequence
|
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / e. Individuation by kind
8291
|
Individuation principles identify what kind it is; identity criteria distinguish items of the same kind
|
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 2. Substance / d. Substance defined
16128
|
A 'substance' is an object which doesn't depend for existence on other objects
|
9. Objects / C. Structure of Objects / 5. Composition of an Object
8279
|
The identity of composite objects isn't fixed by original composition, because how do you identify the origin?
|
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 3. Three-Dimensionalism
8271
|
An object 'endures' if it is always wholly present, and 'perdures' if different parts exist at different times
|
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 4. Four-Dimensionalism
8272
|
How can you identify temporal parts of tomatoes without referring to tomatoes?
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 3. Relative Identity
8305
|
A clear idea of the kind of an object must precede a criterion of identity for it
|
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 4. Type Identity
8290
|
One view is that two objects of the same type are only distinguished by differing in matter
|
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 3. Types of Necessity
15079
|
'Conceptual' necessity is narrow logical necessity, true because of concepts and logical laws
|
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 5. Metaphysical Necessity
16063
|
Metaphysical necessity is logical necessity 'broadly construed' [Lynch/Glasgow]
|
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 6. Logical Necessity
8260
|
Logical necessity can be 'strict' (laws), or 'narrow' (laws and definitions), or 'broad' (all logical worlds)
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 1. Possibility
16131
|
The metaphysically possible is what acceptable principles and categories will permit
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 1. Possible Worlds / e. Against possible worlds
8320
|
Does every abstract possible world exist in every possible world?
|
11. Knowledge Aims / C. Knowing Reality / 3. Idealism / a. Idealism
8280
|
While space may just be appearance, time and change can't be, because the appearances change
|
12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 2. Qualities in Perception / a. Qualities in perception
8276
|
Properties or qualities are essentially adjectival, not objectual
|
17. Mind and Body / A. Mind-Body Dualism / 1. Dualism
8289
|
The idea that Cartesian souls are made of some ghostly 'immaterial' stuff is quite unwarranted
|
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 1. Abstract Thought
8299
|
Abstractions are non-spatial, or dependent, or derived from concepts
|
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 7. Abstracta by Equivalence
8306
|
You can think of a direction without a line, but a direction existing with no lines is inconceivable
|
26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 8. Particular Causation / b. Causal relata
8317
|
To cite facts as the elements in causation is to confuse states of affairs with states of objects
|
27. Natural Reality / C. Space / 3. Points in Space
8269
|
Points are limits of parts of space, so parts of space cannot be aggregates of them
|