Ideas of Barbara Vetter, by Theme
[German, fl. 2014, Studied at Oxford. At Humbolt University, Berlin.]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
2. Reason / E. Argument / 1. Argument
19023
|
Slippery slope arguments are challenges to show where a non-arbitrary boundary lies
|
4. Formal Logic / D. Modal Logic ML / 3. Modal Logic Systems / c. System D
19033
|
Deontic modalities are 'ought-to-be', for sentences, and 'ought-to-do' for predicates
|
4. Formal Logic / D. Modal Logic ML / 3. Modal Logic Systems / h. System S5
19032
|
S5 is undesirable, as it prevents necessities from having contingent grounds
|
4. Formal Logic / D. Modal Logic ML / 7. Barcan Formula
19036
|
The Barcan formula endorses either merely possible things, or makes the unactualised impossible
|
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 1. Nature of Existence
19034
|
The world is either a whole made of its parts, or a container which contains its parts
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / b. Relata of grounding
19015
|
Grounding can be between objects ('relational'), or between sentences ('operational')
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 5. Supervenience / d. Humean supervenience
19012
|
The Humean supervenience base entirely excludes modality
|
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 3. Types of Properties
19024
|
A determinate property must be a unique instance of the determinable class
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 4. Powers as Essence
17954
|
Essence is a thing's necessities, but what about its possibilities (which may not be realised)?
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 6. Dispositions / a. Dispositions
19021
|
I have an 'iterated ability' to learn the violin - that is, the ability to acquire that ability
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 6. Dispositions / c. Dispositions as conditional
19016
|
We should think of dispositions as 'to do' something, not as 'to do something, if ....'
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 6. Dispositions / d. Dispositions as occurrent
19017
|
Nomological dispositions (unlike ordinary ones) have to be continually realised
|
8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 7. Against Powers
19014
|
How can spatiotemporal relations be understood in dispositional terms?
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 4. Essence as Definition
17953
|
Real definition fits abstracta, but not individual concrete objects like Socrates
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 7. Essence and Necessity / a. Essence as necessary properties
17952
|
Modal accounts make essence less mysterious, by basing them on the clearer necessity
|
9. Objects / E. Objects over Time / 12. Origin as Essential
19030
|
Why does origin matter more than development; why are some features of origin more important?
|
19040
|
We take origin to be necessary because we see possibilities as branches from actuality
|
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 2. Nature of Necessity
19008
|
The modern revival of necessity and possibility treated them as special cases of quantification
|
19029
|
It is necessary that p means that nothing has the potentiality for not-p
|
10. Modality / A. Necessity / 5. Metaphysical Necessity
17959
|
Metaphysical necessity is even more deeply empirical than Kripke has argued
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 1. Possibility
17955
|
Possible worlds allow us to talk about degrees of possibility
|
17957
|
Maybe possibility is constituted by potentiality
|
19028
|
Possibilities are potentialities of actual things, but abstracted from their location
|
19010
|
All possibility is anchored in the potentiality of individual objects
|
19013
|
Possibility is a generalised abstraction from the potentiality of its bearer
|
10. Modality / B. Possibility / 4. Potentiality
19009
|
Potentiality does the explaining in metaphysics; we don't explain it away or reduce it
|
19019
|
Potentiality is the common genus of dispositions, abilities, and similar properties
|
19022
|
Water has a potentiality to acquire a potentiality to break (by freezing)
|
19027
|
Potentiality logic is modal system T. Stronger systems collapse iterations, and necessitate potentials
|
19031
|
There are potentialities 'to ...', but possibilities are 'that ....'.
|
19025
|
Potentialities may be too weak to count as 'dispositions'
|
10. Modality / D. Knowledge of Modality / 4. Conceivable as Possible / c. Possible but inconceivable
17958
|
The apparently metaphysically possible may only be epistemically possible
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 1. Possible Worlds / a. Possible worlds
17956
|
Closeness of worlds should be determined by the intrinsic nature of relevant objects
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 2. Nature of Possible Worlds / c. Worlds as propositions
19011
|
If worlds are sets of propositions, how do we know which propositions are genuinely possible?
|
10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / e. Possible Objects
19037
|
Are there possible objects which nothing has ever had the potentiality to produce?
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / a. Types of explanation
19018
|
Explanations by disposition are more stable and reliable than those be external circumstances
|
19020
|
Grounding is a kind of explanation, suited to metaphysics
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 5. Laws from Universals
19039
|
The view that laws are grounded in substance plus external necessity doesn't suit dispositionalism
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / b. Scientific necessity
19038
|
Dispositional essentialism allows laws to be different, but only if the supporting properties differ
|
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / c. Essence and laws
17993
|
Laws are relations of kinds, quantities and qualities, supervening on the essences of a domain
|
27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 1. Nature of Time / f. Eternalism
19026
|
If time is symmetrical between past and future, why do they look so different?
|
27. Natural Reality / D. Time / 1. Nature of Time / h. Presentism
19041
|
Presentists explain cross-temporal relations using surrogate descriptions
|