Ideas of Robert Fogelin, by Theme
[American, fl. 2003, Professor at Dartmouth College, USA]
green numbers give full details |
back to list of philosophers |
expand these ideas
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 7. Despair over Philosophy
6575
|
Philosophy may never find foundations, and may undermine our lives in the process
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 1. On Reason
6585
|
Rationality is threatened by fear of inconsistency, illusions of absolutes or relativism, and doubt
|
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 9. Limits of Reason
6568
|
A game can be played, despite having inconsistent rules
|
6557
|
Humans may never be able to attain a world view which is both rich and consistent
|
2. Reason / B. Laws of Thought / 1. Laws of Thought
6560
|
The law of noncontradiction is traditionally the most basic principle of rationality
|
2. Reason / B. Laws of Thought / 3. Non-Contradiction
6565
|
The law of noncontradiction makes the distinction between asserting something and denying it
|
2. Reason / E. Argument / 3. Analogy
6574
|
Legal reasoning is analogical, not deductive
|
10. Modality / C. Sources of Modality / 3. Necessity by Convention
6582
|
Conventions can only work if they are based on something non-conventional
|
12. Knowledge Sources / C. Rationalism / 1. Rationalism
6576
|
My view is 'circumspect rationalism' - that only our intellect can comprehend the world
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / c. Defeasibility
6589
|
Knowledge is legitimate only if all relevant defeaters have been eliminated
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / a. Coherence as justification
6596
|
For coherentists, circularity is acceptable if the circle is large, rich and coherent
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
6597
|
A rule of justification might be: don't raise the level of scrutiny without a good reason
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 2. Types of Scepticism
6588
|
Scepticism is cartesian (sceptical scenarios), or Humean (future), or Pyrrhonian (suspend belief)
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
6590
|
Scepticism deals in remote possibilities that are ineliminable and set the standard very high
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / E. Relativism / 1. Relativism
6583
|
Radical perspectivism replaces Kant's necessary scheme with many different schemes
|
18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 5. Rationality / b. Human rationality
6555
|
We are also irrational, with a unique ability to believe in bizarre self-created fictions
|
21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 3. Taste
6605
|
Critics must be causally entangled with their subject matter
|
21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 4. Beauty
6607
|
The word 'beautiful', when deprived of context, is nearly contentless
|
21. Aesthetics / C. Artistic Issues / 5. Objectivism in Art
6604
|
Saying 'It's all a matter to taste' ignores the properties of the object discussed
|
22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / e. Human nature
6586
|
Cynics are committed to morality, but disappointed or disgusted by human failings
|
25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 3. Punishment / a. Right to punish
6572
|
Deterrence, prevention, rehabilitation and retribution can come into conflict in punishments
|
6573
|
Retributivists say a crime can be 'paid for'; deterrentists still worry about potential victims
|