green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of Stewart Cohen, by Text
[American, fl. 1998, Professor at Arizona State University.]
2005
|
Contextualism Defended (and reply)
|
1
|
p.69
|
19558
|
Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate
|
1
|
p.70
|
19559
|
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts
|
1
|
p.79
|
19561
|
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know
|
1
|
p.81
|
19563
|
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification
|
3
|
p.74
|
19560
|
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued
|
2005
|
Contextualism Defended
|
p.57
|
p.57
|
12893
|
Contextualism says sceptical arguments are true, relative to their strict context
|
p.58
|
p.58
|
12894
|
There aren't invariant high standards for knowledge, because even those can be raised
|
p.68
|
p.68
|
12896
|
Knowledge is context-sensitive, because justification is
|