green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of Robert Boyle, by Text
[Irish, 1627 - 1691, Wealthy independent scientist.]
1661
|
The Sceptical Chemist
|
p.569
|
p.60
|
15961
|
I don't see how mere moving matter can lead to the bodies of men and animals, and especially their seeds
|
1666
|
The Origin of Forms and Qualities
|
|
p.18
|
15952
|
The corpuscles just have shape, size and motion, which explains things without 'sympathies' or 'forces' [Alexander,P]
|
|
p.66
|
15962
|
Boyle's term 'texture' is not something you feel, but is unobservable structures of particles [Alexander,P]
|
|
p.71
|
15964
|
Boyle's secondary qualities are not illusory, or 'in the mind' [Alexander,P]
|
|
p.72
|
15965
|
Boyle attacked a contemporary belief that powers were occult things [Alexander,P]
|
|
p.120
|
15972
|
The corpuscular theory allows motion, but does not include forces between the particles [Alexander,P]
|
|
p.521
|
16735
|
In the 17th century, 'disposition' usually just means the spatial arrangement of parts [Pasnau]
|
p.324
|
p.8
|
16034
|
Form is not a separate substance, but just the manner, modification or 'stamp' of matter
|
p.41?
|
p.56
|
15957
|
Essential definitions show the differences that discriminate things, and make them what they are
|
p.46?
|
p.59
|
15960
|
Explanation is deducing a phenomenon from some nature better known to us
|
p.47?
|
p.43
|
15953
|
To cite a substantial form tells us what produced the effect, but not how it did it
|
1672
|
Certain Physical Essays
|
II:21
|
p.530
|
16736
|
Explanation is generally to deduce it from something better known, which comes in degrees
|
II:22
|
p.530
|
16737
|
The best explanations get down to primary basics, but others go less deep
|