green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of M.R. Ayers, by Text
[British, fl. 1975, Professor at Oxford University, and fellow of Wadham College.]
1974
|
Individuals without Sortals
|
Intro
|
p.113
|
17509
|
Some say a 'covering concept' completes identity; others place the concept in the reference
|
Intro
|
p.114
|
17510
|
Speakers need the very general category of a thing, if they are to think about it
|
Intro
|
p.117
|
17511
|
Recognising continuity is separate from sortals, and must precede their use
|
'Concl'
|
p.144
|
17520
|
Events do not have natural boundaries, and we have to set them
|
'Concl'
|
p.144
|
17521
|
You can't have the concept of a 'stage' if you lack the concept of an object
|
'Concl'
|
p.146
|
17522
|
We use sortals to classify physical objects by the nature and origin of their unity
|
'Concl'
|
p.147
|
17523
|
Sortals basically apply to individuals
|
'Counting'
|
p.139
|
17519
|
To express borderline cases of objects, you need the concept of an 'object'
|
'Counting'
|
p.139
|
17518
|
Counting 'coin in this box' may have coin as the unit, with 'in this box' merely as the scope
|
'Prob'
|
p.119
|
17512
|
If diachronic identities need covering concepts, why not synchronic identities too?
|
'Prob'
|
p.120
|
17513
|
If there are two objects, then 'that marble, man-shaped object' is ambiguous
|
'Prob'
|
p.122
|
17514
|
Temporal 'parts' cannot be separated or rearranged
|
'Realist' vi
|
p.131
|
17515
|
Seeing caterpillar and moth as the same needs continuity, not identity of sortal concepts
|
'Realist' vii
|
p.131
|
17516
|
If counting needs a sortal, what of things which fall under two sortals?
|
'Realist' vii
|
p.132
|
17517
|
Could the same matter have more than one form or principle of unity?
|