more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 10663

[filed under theme 18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 1. Thought ]

Full Idea

A thought can refer to a particular or a universal or a state of affairs, but it can predicate only a universal and it can affirm only a state of affairs.

Gist of Idea

A thought can refer to many things, but only predicate a universal and affirm a state of affairs

Source

Keith Hossack (Plurals and Complexes [2000], 1)

Book Ref

-: 'British Soc for the Philosophy of Science' [-], p.411


A Reaction

Hossack is summarising Armstrong's view, which he is accepting. To me, 'thought' must allow for animals, unlike language. I think Hossack's picture is much too clear-cut. Do animals grasp universals? Doubtful. Can they predicate? Yes.


The 21 ideas from 'Plurals and Complexes'

Plural reference will refer to complex facts without postulating complex things [Hossack]
Complex particulars are either masses, or composites, or sets [Hossack]
Leibniz's Law argues against atomism - water is wet, unlike water molecules [Hossack]
A thought can refer to many things, but only predicate a universal and affirm a state of affairs [Hossack]
We are committed to a 'group' of children, if they are sitting in a circle [Hossack]
Plural reference is just an abbreviation when properties are distributive, but not otherwise [Hossack]
Plural definite descriptions pick out the largest class of things that fit the description [Hossack]
A plural comprehension principle says there are some things one of which meets some condition [Hossack]
Plural language can discuss without inconsistency things that are not members of themselves [Hossack]
A plural language gives a single comprehensive induction axiom for arithmetic [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice is a non-logical principle of set-theory [Hossack]
Extensional mereology needs two definitions and two axioms [Hossack]
The relation of composition is indispensable to the part-whole relation for individuals [Hossack]
The fusion of five rectangles can decompose into more than five parts that are rectangles [Hossack]
In arithmetic singularists need sets as the instantiator of numeric properties [Hossack]
The theory of the transfinite needs the ordinal numbers [Hossack]
I take the real numbers to be just lengths [Hossack]
We could ignore space, and just talk of the shape of matter [Hossack]
Set theory is the science of infinity [Hossack]
The Axiom of Choice guarantees a one-one correspondence from sets to ordinals [Hossack]
Maybe we reduce sets to ordinals, rather than the other way round [Hossack]