more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11909

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 5. Essence as Kind ]

Full Idea

There is a disanalogy between 'necessarily water=H2O' and 'necessarily Hesperus=Phosphorus'. The second just needs the necessity of identity, but the first needs 'x is a water sample' and 'x is an H2O' sample to coincide in all possible worlds.

Gist of Idea

Unlike Hesperus=Phosophorus, water=H2O needs further premisses before it is necessary

Source

Penelope Mackie (How Things Might Have Been [2006], 10.1.)

Book Ref

Mackie,Penelope: 'How Things Might Have Been' [OUP 2006], p.198


A Reaction

This comment is mainly aimed at Kripke, who bases his essentialism on identities, rather than at Putnam.


The 18 ideas from Penelope Mackie

An individual essence is the properties the object could not exist without [Mackie,P]
The Kripke and Putnam view of kinds makes them explanatorily basic, but has modal implications [Mackie,P]
Locke's kind essences are explanatory, without being necessary to the kind [Mackie,P]
Unlike Hesperus=Phosophorus, water=H2O needs further premisses before it is necessary [Mackie,P]
Maybe the identity of kinds is necessary, but instances being of that kind is not [Mackie,P]
No other object can possibly have the same individual essence as some object [Mackie,P]
A haecceity is the essential, simple, unanalysable property of being-this-thing [Mackie,P]
The theory of 'haecceitism' does not need commitment to individual haecceities [Mackie,P]
There are problems both with individual essences and without them [Mackie,P]
Transworld identity without individual essences leads to 'bare identities' [Mackie,P]
Essentialism must avoid both reduplication of essences, and multiple occupancy by essences [Mackie,P]
De re modality without bare identities or individual essence needs counterparts [Mackie,P]
Things may only be counterparts under some particular relation [Mackie,P]
Possibilities for Caesar must be based on some phase of the real Caesar [Mackie,P]
Origin is not a necessity, it is just 'tenacious'; we keep it fixed in counterfactual discussions [Mackie,P]
A principle of individuation may pinpoint identity and distinctness, now and over time [Mackie,P]
Individuation may include counterfactual possibilities, as well as identity and persistence [Mackie,P]
Why are any sortals essential, and why are only some of them essential? [Mackie,P]