more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 24004

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 2. Elements of Virtue Theory / e. Character ]

Full Idea

Empirical psychologists have suggested that our practice of trait ascription is systematically prone to error. Some philosophers have concluded that the whole business of trait ascription, and of virtue ethics, should be abandoned.

Gist of Idea

Psychologists suggest we are muddled about traits, and maybe they should be abandoned

Source

Peter Goldie (The Emotions [2000], 6 'Traits')

Book Ref

Goldie,Peter: 'The Emotions' [OUP 2002], p.160


A Reaction

[He cites Ross and Nisbet, and Gilbert Harman as a sceptic] I suspect the problem is that character traits are not precise enough for scientific assessment. How else are we going to describe a person? What else can we say at funerals?