more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 4094

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / c. Knowledge argument ]

Full Idea

In experience we learn propositions, since someone can reason using the sentence 'Red looks like this' (e.g. 'If red looks like this, then either it looks like this to dogs or it doesn't').

Gist of Idea

Experience teaches us propositions, because we can reason about our phenomenal experience

Source

Tim Crane (Elements of Mind [2001], 3.28)

Book Ref

Crane,Tim: 'Elements of Mind' [OUP 2001], p.96


A Reaction

The fact that we can create propositions about experiences doesn't prove that experience is inherently propositional.


The 7 ideas with the same theme [qualia knowledge goes beyond physical knowledge]:

If a blind persons suddenly sees a kestrel, that doesn't make visual and theoretical kestrels different [Papineau on Jackson]
No one bothers to imagine what it would really be like to have ALL the physical information [Dennett on Jackson]
Mary learns when she sees colour, so her complete physical information had missed something [Jackson]
Knowledge and inversion make functionalism about qualia doubtful [Kim]
Mary acquires new concepts; she previously thought about the same property using material concepts [Papineau]
Experience teaches us propositions, because we can reason about our phenomenal experience [Crane]
A scientist could know everything about the physiology of headaches, but never have had one [Heil]