more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 12652

[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 3. Ontology of Concepts / a. Concepts as representations ]

Full Idea

We think in file names, and file names are Janus-faced: one face turned towards thinking and the other face turned towards what is thought about. I do think that is rather satisfactory.

Gist of Idea

Concepts have two sides; they are files that face thought, and also face subject-matter

Source

Jerry A. Fodor (LOT 2 [2008], Ch.3 App)

Book Ref

Fodor,Jerry A.: 'LOT 2: the Language of Thought Revisited' [OUP 2008], p.100


A Reaction

So do I. I do hope the philosophical community take up this idea (which they probably won't, simply because Fodor is in the late stages of his career!).


The 41 ideas from 'LOT 2'

Knowing that must come before knowing how [Fodor]
If concept content is reference, then my Twin and I are referring to the same stuff [Fodor]
Pragmatism is the worst idea ever [Fodor]
Only the labels of nodes have semantic content in connectionism, and they play no role [Fodor]
For the referential view of thought, the content of a concept is just its reference [Fodor]
Before you can plan action, you must decide on the truth of your estimate of success [Fodor]
Cartesians put concept individuation before concept possession [Fodor]
In the Representational view, concepts play the key linking role [Fodor]
Definitions often give necessary but not sufficient conditions for an extension [Fodor]
'Inferential-role semantics' says meaning is determined by role in inference [Fodor]
Having a concept isn't a pragmatic matter, but being able to think about the concept [Fodor]
Mental states have causal powers [Fodor]
Mental representations name things in the world, but also files in our memory [Fodor]
Names in thought afford a primitive way to bring John before the mind [Fodor]
'Paderewski' has two names in mentalese, for his pianist file and his politician file [Fodor]
We think in file names [Fodor]
Concepts have two sides; they are files that face thought, and also face subject-matter [Fodor]
Some beliefs are only inferred when needed, like 'Shakespeare had not telephone' [Fodor]
Frege's puzzles suggest to many that concepts have sense as well as reference [Fodor]
If concepts have sense, we can't see the connection to their causal powers [Fodor]
Co-referring terms differ if they have different causal powers [Fodor]
Belief in 'senses' may explain intentionality, but not mental processes [Fodor]
Associative thinking avoids syntax, but can't preserve sense, reference or truth [Fodor]
Connectionism gives no account of how constituents make complex concepts [Fodor]
Who cares what 'philosophy' is? Most pre-1950 thought doesn't now count as philosophy [Fodor]
Ambiguities in English are the classic reason for claiming that we don't think in English [Fodor]
Semantics (esp. referential semantics) allows inferences from utterances to the world [Fodor]
Semantics relates to the world, so it is never just psychological [Fodor]
You can't think 'brown dog' without thinking 'brown' and 'dog' [Fodor]
There's statistical, logical, nomological, conceptual and metaphysical possibility [Fodor]
Frame Problem: how to eliminate most beliefs as irrelevant, without searching them? [Fodor]
P-and-Q gets its truth from the truth of P and truth of Q, but consistency isn't like that [Fodor]
Abstractionism claims that instances provide criteria for what is shared [Fodor]
Maybe stereotypes are a stage in concept acquisition (rather than a by-product) [Fodor]
One stereotype might be a paradigm for two difference concepts [Fodor]
Nobody knows how concepts are acquired [Fodor]
We have an innate capacity to form a concept, once we have grasped the stereotype [Fodor]
The different types of resemblance don't resemble one another [Fodor]
A truth-table, not inferential role, defines 'and' [Fodor]
We refer to individuals and to properties, and we use singular terms and predicates [Fodor]
Compositionality requires that concepts be atomic [Fodor]