Single Idea 23713

[catalogued under 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / c. Essence and laws]

Full Idea

According to Bird, non-fundamental laws supervene on fundamental laws, and so are ultimately explained by fundamental powers.

Gist of Idea

Most laws supervene on fundamental laws, which are explained by basic powers

Source

report of Alexander Bird (Nature's Metaphysics [2007]) by Friend/Kimpton-Nye - Dispositions and Powers 3.6.1

Book Reference

Friend/Kimpton-Nye: 'Dispositions and Powers' [CUP 2023], p.65


A Reaction

This looks like the picture I subscribe to. Roughly, fundamental laws are explained by powers, and non-fundamental laws are explained by properties, which are complexes of powers. 'Fundamental' may not be a precise term!