Combining Philosophers

All the ideas for Thrasymachus, Daniel M. Mittag and Hannah Arendt

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these philosophers

---

7 ideas

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism

19722

We could know the evidence for our belief without knowing why it is such evidence [Mittag]

19723

Evidentialism can't explain that we accept knowledge claims if the evidence is forgotten [Mittag]

19720

Evidentialism concerns the evidence for the proposition, not for someone to believe it [Mittag]

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique

19721

Coherence theories struggle with the role of experience [Mittag]

24. Political Theory / C. Ruling a State / 2. Leaders / c. Despotism

20580

The ideal subject for dictators is not a fanatic, but someone who can't distinguish true from false [Arendt, by Oksala]

20579

Modern totalitarianism results from lack of social ties or shared goals [Arendt, by Oksala]

28. God / C. Attitudes to God / 3. Deism

1558	Clearly the gods ignore human affairs, or they would have given us justice [Thrasymachus]