Combining Philosophers

All the ideas for Anaxarchus, Chauncey Wright and Daniel M. Mittag

expand these ideas     |    start again     |     specify just one area for these philosophers

---

6 ideas

11. Knowledge Aims / C. Knowing Reality / 2. Phenomenalism

18988

Behind the bare phenomenal facts there is nothing [Wright,Ch]

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / b. Evidentialism

19722

We could know the evidence for our belief without knowing why it is such evidence [Mittag]

19723

Evidentialism can't explain that we accept knowledge claims if the evidence is forgotten [Mittag]

19720

Evidentialism concerns the evidence for the proposition, not for someone to believe it [Mittag]

13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique

19721

Coherence theories struggle with the role of experience [Mittag]

13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 1. Scepticism

3061	Anaxarchus said that he was not even sure that he knew nothing [Anaxarchus, by Diog. Laertius]