Combining Philosophers
Ideas for Eubulides, Hilary Putnam and Sphaerus
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
14 ideas
3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 1. Truth
|
6276
|
'The rug is green' might be warrantedly assertible even though the rug is not green [Putnam]
|
|
4714
|
Putnam's epistemic notion of truth replaces the realism of correspondence with ontological relativism [Putnam, by O'Grady]
|
3. Truth / C. Correspondence Truth / 1. Correspondence Truth
|
6266
|
We need the correspondence theory of truth to understand language and science [Putnam]
|
|
7617
|
Before Kant, all philosophers had a correspondence theory of truth [Putnam]
|
3. Truth / C. Correspondence Truth / 3. Correspondence Truth critique
|
6277
|
Correspondence between concepts and unconceptualised reality is impossible [Putnam]
|
|
4716
|
The correspondence theory is wrong, because there is no one correspondence between reality and fact [Putnam, by O'Grady]
|
3. Truth / E. Pragmatic Truth / 1. Pragmatic Truth
|
8828
|
Truth is rational acceptability [Putnam]
|
|
7616
|
Truth is an idealisation of rational acceptability [Putnam]
|
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 1. Tarski's Truth / a. Tarski's truth definition
|
18951
|
For scientific purposes there is a precise concept of 'true-in-L', using set theory [Putnam]
|
3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 2. Semantic Truth
|
6264
|
In Tarski's definition, you understand 'true' if you accept the notions of the object language [Putnam]
|
|
6265
|
Tarski has given a correct account of the formal logic of 'true', but there is more to the concept [Putnam]
|
|
6269
|
Only Tarski has found a way to define 'true' [Putnam]
|
|
2345
|
Semantic notions do not occur in Tarski's definitions, but assessing their correctness involves translation [Putnam]
|
3. Truth / H. Deflationary Truth / 1. Redundant Truth
|
2347
|
Asserting the truth of an indexical statement is not the same as uttering the statement [Putnam]
|