Combining Philosophers
Ideas for H.Putnam/P.Oppenheim, David Marshall and Laurence Bonjour
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these philosophers
display all the ideas for this combination of philosophers
25 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / a. Foundationalism
4255
|
Externalist theories of knowledge are one species of foundationalism [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / b. Basic beliefs
4257
|
The big problem for foundationalism is to explain how basic beliefs are possible [Bonjour]
|
8896
|
Conscious states have built-in awareness of content, so we know if a conceptual description of it is correct [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / d. Rational foundations
3696
|
A priori justification requires understanding but no experience [Bonjour]
|
3703
|
You can't explain away a priori justification as analyticity, and you can't totally give it up [Bonjour]
|
3706
|
A priori justification can vary in degree [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / e. Pro-foundations
4256
|
The main argument for foundationalism is that all other theories involve a regress leading to scepticism [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
3699
|
The induction problem blocks any attempted proof of physical statements [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / a. Coherence as justification
21506
|
A coherence theory of justification can combine with a correspondence theory of truth [Bonjour]
|
21509
|
There will always be a vast number of equally coherent but rival systems [Bonjour]
|
21503
|
Empirical coherence must attribute reliability to spontaneous experience [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / b. Pro-coherentism
21511
|
A well written novel cannot possibly match a real belief system for coherence [Bonjour]
|
21510
|
The objection that a negated system is equally coherent assume that coherence is consistency [Bonjour]
|
21505
|
A coherent system can be justified with initial beliefs lacking all credibility [Bonjour]
|
21504
|
The best explanation of coherent observations is they are caused by and correspond to reality [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique
8891
|
My incoherent beliefs about art should not undermine my very coherent beliefs about physics [Bonjour]
|
8892
|
Coherence seems to justify empirical beliefs about externals when there is no external input [Bonjour]
|
8894
|
Coherentists must give a reason why coherent justification is likely to lead to the truth [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 1. External Justification
4258
|
Extreme externalism says no more justification is required than the truth of the belief [Bonjour]
|
3701
|
Externalist theories of justification don't require believers to have reasons for their beliefs [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 3. Reliabilism / a. Reliable knowledge
8889
|
Reliabilists disagree over whether some further requirement is needed to produce knowledge [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 3. Reliabilism / b. Anti-reliabilism
4259
|
External reliability is not enough, if the internal state of the believer is known to be irrational [Bonjour]
|
8890
|
If the reliable facts producing a belief are unknown to me, my belief is not rational or responsible [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 10. Anti External Justification
4260
|
Even if there is no obvious irrationality, it may be irrational to base knowledge entirely on external criteria [Bonjour]
|
3702
|
Externalism means we have no reason to believe, which is strong scepticism [Bonjour]
|