22125 | Duns Scotus was a realist about universals [Duns Scotus, by Dumont] |
5409 | Normal existence is in time, so we must say that universals 'subsist' [Russell] |
4446 | It is claimed that some universals are not exemplified by any particular, so must exist separately [Armstrong] |
15729 | Uninstantiated properties must be defined using the instantiated ones [Quinton] |
8499 | Nominalists cannot translate 'red resembles pink more than blue' into particulars [Jackson] |
7962 | Uninstantiated properties are useful in philosophy [Oliver] |
10727 | Uninstantiated universals seem to exist if they themselves have properties [Oliver] |
8962 | 'There are shapes which are never exemplified' is the toughest example for nominalists [Hoffman/Rosenkrantz] |
8307 | Particulars are instantiations, and universals are instantiables [Lowe] |
4452 | Maybe universals are real, if properties themselves have properties, and relate to other properties [Moreland] |
4467 | A naturalist and realist about universals is forced to say redness can be both moving and stationary [Moreland] |
4469 | There are spatial facts about red particulars, but not about redness itself [Moreland] |
4468 | How could 'being even', or 'being a father', or a musical interval, exist naturally in space? [Moreland] |