more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 3529

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / D. Property Dualism / 1. Reductionism critique ]

Full Idea

Davidson rejects ontological reduction of mental to physical because propositional attitudes are holistic; there must be extensive coherence among someone's attitudes to treat them as a rational person, and this has no counterpart in physical theory.

Gist of Idea

Reduction is impossible because mind is holistic and brain isn't

Source

report of Donald Davidson (Mental Events [1970]) by Keith T. Maslin - Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind 7.5

Book Ref

Maslin,Keith: 'An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind' [Polity 2001], p.202


A Reaction

I don't find this view persuasive. We treat the weather in simple terms, even though it is almost infinitely complex. Davidson has a Kantian overconfidence in our rationality. A coherence among the parts is needed to be a tree.


The 13 ideas from 'Mental Events'

Reduction is impossible because mind is holistic and brain isn't [Davidson, by Maslin]
Anomalous monism says nothing at all about the relationship between mental and physical [Davidson, by Kim]
Mind is outside science, because it is humanistic and partly normative [Davidson, by Lycan]
Anomalous monism says causes are events, so the mental and physical are identical, without identical properties [Davidson, by Crane]
If rule-following and reason are 'anomalies', does that make reductionism impossible? [Davidson, by Kim]
Davidson claims that mental must be physical, to make mental causation possible [Davidson, by Kim]
If mental causation is lawless, it is only possible if mental events have physical properties [Davidson, by Kim]
Multiple realisability was worse news for physicalism than anomalous monism was [Davidson, by Kim]
Davidson sees identity as between events, not states, since they are related in causation [Davidson, by Lowe]
Causation is either between events, or between descriptions of events [Davidson, by Maslin]
Whether an event is a causal explanation depends on how it is described [Davidson, by Maslin]
Supervenience of the mental means physical changes mental, and mental changes physical [Davidson]
There are no rules linking thought and behaviour, because endless other thoughts intervene [Davidson]
email your comments